Widespread, but survivable
Severity and reach correlate, but the interesting stories live in the residual. Most families run systemic-over-severity — pervasive, structural, low-drama rot is the default mode, and acute isolated catastrophe the rare exception. Only integrity work inverts it: severe but contained, because it prosecutes named actors.
Above the diagonal = widespread-but-mild. Every governance/delivery family sits there; the one on the line has findings as severe as they are systemic. Click a bubble for its live profile.
Positive = more systemic than severe.
The two archetypes
Topics that are the dominant subject of ≥8 reports, at each extreme of the gap. Click any topic for its live detail.
Fragmented oversight, weak outcome measurement, structural misalignment — everywhere, chronic, no single victim. Where cheap, systemic reform buys the most, precisely because no crisis is forcing it.
High evidentiary severity against a specific officer, council or operation, deliberately bounded to the proven case — even where the topic label suggests something wider.